Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7714 13
Original file (NR7714 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No:NRO7714-13
2 December 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Sub] : a

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser §12/0548
of 6 Nov 2013

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-6 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve
advancement cycle.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
Rxnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
reguiations within the Department of the Navy. |

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in

Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
Docket No.NRO7714-13

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BU1 from the August 2011
Navy-wige Reserve examination with an effective date of 16 March
2012 and a Time In, Date of 1 January 2012.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

brant ¢ Luentapnandt-
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMER

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

2 December 2013

  

Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4748-13

    Original file (NR4748-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/HT3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013, and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4691-13

    Original file (NR4691-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5165-13

    Original file (NR5165-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MA1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3473-13

    Original file (NR3473-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/AZ2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement examination and for the change in rank to be reflected on her DD Form 214. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and,. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13

    Original file (NR8640 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5858-13

    Original file (NR5858-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/ABH2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3410-13

    Original file (NR3410-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tie Ce oie eo Tes Gon fae PE See Nar TY TPL a ae ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NR03410-13 22 August 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF - RECORD 1CO (i, Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14

    Original file (NR3145 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR614 14

    Original file (NR614 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to LS1/E6 from the August 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05938-12

    Original file (05938-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-5/A02 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...